Utilizing sugar beet molasses for stabilization and dust suppression of mine haul road soil: A case study of Abyek Cement Mine
Abstract
Introduction: Haul roads are one of the main sources of dust in mines. Dust pollution not only causes lung diseases, but also reduces the useful vision of machine drivers, slows down trucks, and interferes with transportation operations. On the other hand, machines' operation in dust increases their depreciation and fuel consumption. The popular spraying method is used in mines to overcome this problem. To suppress dust on mining roads, water and oil mulch are commonly used. The first method requires a large amount of water, and the second method has undesirable environmental effects. Therefore, an appropriate alternative method should be found. According to the results, the proposed method may be effective in dust suppression. This process causes both environmental and operational difficulties, includinghigh water consumption, inefficiency in hot and dry areas, and costly water supply in many regions, not to mention its cultural value, soil liquefaction,
traffic by the irrigation process, imposing repairing and maintaining costs for sprinklers and ramps, etc.
Materials and methods: Soil stabilization is a technique that enhances the engineering and mechanical characteristics of soil, such as its strength, stiffness, formation, and loading capacity using technology and proper materials. The present research aimed at finding out how the physical and strength properties could be improved with the addition of optimum ratios of sugar beet molasses to the ramp soils to make the unpaved roads within the Abyek cement mine region stronger and more durable.
Results: As analytical tests for soils containing additives with specified weight percentages, Atterberg limits, compaction, Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), and direct shear tests were conducted. The incorporation of sugar beet molasses into both soils resulted in an 11.6% reduction in Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) and increased the Maximum Dry Density (MDD) to 1.955 g/cm³ for AB01 soil and 1.942 g/cm³ for AB02 soil.
Conclusion: The optimal result was obtained from direct shear and unconfined compressive tests by adding 2% molasses for AB02 soil and 1% molasses for AB01 soil.
2. Reed WR, Westman EC, Haycocks C. An improved model for estimating particulate emissions from surface mining operations in the eastern United States. In: Securing the Future, International Conference on Mining and the Environment, Proceedings. Skellefteå, Sweden: The Swedish Mining Association; 2001. p. 693-702.
3. Thompson RJ, Visser AT. Mine haul road fugitive dust emission and exposure characterisation. [Unknown publication]; 2001 Jan.
4. Thompson RJ, Visser AT. Selection, performance and economic valuation of dust palliatives on surface mine haul roads. J S Afr Inst Min Metall. 2007;107(7):435-50.
5. Gillies JA, Etyemezian V, Kuhns H, Nikolic D, Gillette DA. Effect of vehicle characteristics on unpaved road dust emissions. Atmos Environ. 2005;39(13):2341-7.
6. US Environmental Protection Agency. AP 42, Fifth Edition Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary and Point Sources. [Internet]. Washington, DC: US EPA; 1995 [cited 2026 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/c00s00.pdf.
7. Gebhart DL, Denight ML, Grau RH. Dust control guidance and technology selection key. 1999.
8. Valenzuela P, Palma JH, Vega S. Dust suppressant treatments. Quality control. Rev La Construcción. 2014;13(3):27-35.
9. Du Plessis JJL, van Rensburg L, van Rensburg LP. Effectiveness of applying dust suppression palliatives on haul roads. 2016.
10. Li S, Hu X, Zhao Y, Wu M, Feng Y, Li X, et al. Evaluation of dust fixation effect of urease-based biological dust suppressant and its field application. J Environ Manage. 2024; 371:123119.
11. Sieger JL, Lottermoser BG, Freer J. Effectiveness of protein and polysaccharide biopolymers as dust suppressants on mine soils: large-scale field trials. Mining. 2023;3(3):428-62.
12. Sanders TG, Addo JQ, Ariniello A, Heiden WF. Relative effectiveness of road dust suppressants. J Transp Eng. 1997;123(5):393-7.
13. Du C, Cai S, Jiang ZA. Experimental study on controlling road dust raising in the open mine with the YCH dust suppressant. Chin J Eng. 2007;29(S2):45-8.
14. Du Plessis JJL, Janse van Rensburg L, Jansen van Rensburg LP. Effectiveness of applying dust suppression palliatives on haul roads. 2016.
15. Omane D, Liu WV, Pourrahimian Y. Comparison of chemical suppressants under different atmospheric temperatures for the control of fugitive dust emission on mine haul roads. Atmos Pollut Res. 2018;9(3):561-8.
16. Huang J, Ho CH, Wu Z, Gao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. Evaluation of co-polymer-based dust suppressant mixed with soil in unpaved road: lab experiment. In: Civil Infrastructures Confronting Severe Weathers and Climate Changes Conference; 2018. p. 10-9.
17. Kovshov S, Kovshov V. Chemical technology of dust suppression on open-pit mines. Int J Ecol Dev. 2015;30(3):55-67.
18. ASTM International. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft³ (600 kN-m/m³)) (D698-07e1). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1992.
19. ASTM International. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions (D3080-03). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2003. p. 1-7.
20. ASTM International. Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil (D2166). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2006.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 11 No 1 (2026): Winter 2026 | |
| Section | Original Research | |
| Keywords | ||
| Haul roads dust; Dust suppression; Molasses; Sugar beet; Atterberg limits tets | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


