Assessing the influence of PM2.5 and PM10 on subjective thermal comfort in university classrooms
Abstract
Introduction: Indoor air quality plays a significant role in students' health and productivity. The present study attempts to examine the impact of air pollution on subjective thermal comfort and explores how the interaction
between thermal conditions and Particulate Matter (PM) affects students' thermal comfort and health.
Materials and methods: The data were collected through objective and subjective methods. The objective method consists the measurement of air pollution and meteorological parameters using the particle counter PCE-MPC 20. At the same time, subjective questionnaires were developed to obtain data relative to the students' sensations, preferences, and indoor environment during two periods of student occupancy and under two conditions: one with closed windows and one with natural ventilation.
Results: Findings show that the average indoor and outdoor PM concentrations exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) standard. These suggest that universities would benefit from upgrading their heating systems and providing humidifiers. Results also highlight the difference between Predicted Mean
Vote (PMV) and Thermal comfort; Thermal Sensation Vote (TSV), Thermal Preference Vote (TPV) and the need for adopted strategies in the perceived thermal comfort assessments. Additionally, the static results indicated the significant impact of PM on both TSV and TPV (P values<0.05) regardless of whether the windows are open or closed.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted in Algeria to evaluate the effects of air pollution on students' perceived thermal comfort. The results underline the importance of addressing indoor air quality and prioritising natural ventilation strategies to enhance both student well-being and academic performance
2. Fang Y, Luo X, Lu J. A review of research on the impact of the classroom physical environment on schoolchildren's health. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023 Apr 15;65:105430.
3. Brink HW, Krijnen WP, Loomans MG, Mobach MP, Kort HS. Positive effects of indoor environmental conditions on students and their performance in higher education classrooms: A between-groups experiment. Science of the Total Environment. 2023 Apr 15;869:161813.
4. Alves C, Nunes T, Silva J, Duarte M. Comfort parameters and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2. 5) in school classrooms and outdoor air. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2013 May;13(5):1521-35.
5. Burridge HC, Bontitsopoulos S, Brown C, Carter H, Roberts K, Vouriot C, et al. Variations in classroom ventilation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from monitoring 36 naturally ventilated classrooms in the UK during 2021. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023 Jan 1;63:105459.
6. Ding E, Zhang D, Hamida A, García-Sánchez C, Jonker L, de Boer AR, et al. Ventilation and thermal conditions in secondary schools in the Netherlands: Effects of COVID-19 pandemic control and prevention measures. Building and Environment. 2023 Feb 1;229:109922.
7. Bidassey-Manilal S, Wright CY, Engelbrecht JC, Albers PN, Garland RM, Matooane M. Students’ perceived heat-health symptoms increased with warmer classroom temperatures. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2016 Jun;13(6):566.
8. Ferreira AM, Cardoso M. Indoor air quality and health in schools. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 2014;40(03):259-68.
9. Mendell MJ, Eliseeva EA, Davies MM, Spears M, Lobscheid A, Fisk WJ, et al. Association of classroom ventilation with reduced illness absence: A prospective study in C alifornia elementary schools. Indoor air. 2013 Dec;23(6):515-28.
10. Madureira J, Paciência I, Rufo J, Ramos E, Barros H, Teixeira JP,et al. Indoor air quality in schools and its relationship with children's respiratory symptoms. Atmospheric Environment. 2015 Oct 1;118:145-56.
11. Matthaios VN, Kang CM, Wolfson JM, Greco KF, Gaffin JM, Hauptman M, et al. Factors influencing classroom exposures to fine particles, black carbon, and nitrogen dioxide in inner-city schools and their implications for indoor air quality. Environmental health perspectives. 2022 Apr 21;130(4):047005.
12. Son YS. A review on indoor and outdoor factors affecting the level of particulate matter in classrooms of elementary schools. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023 Sep 15;75:106957.
13. Arya VK, Rasheed EO, Samarasinghe DA, Wilkinson S. Comparative Analysis of Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort Standards in School Buildings across New Zealand with Other OECD Countries. Buildings. 2024 May 27;14(6):1556.
14. Miao S, Gangolells M, Tejedor B. A comprehensive assessment of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in educational buildings in the Mediterranean climate. Indoor Air. 2023;2023(1):6649829.
15. Lin D, Gao S, Zhen M. The comprehensive impact of thermal-PM2.5 interaction on subjective evaluation of urban outdoor space: A pilot study in a cold region of China. Plos one. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304617.
16. Zhong C, Chen C, Liu Y, Gao P, Li H. A specific study on the impacts of PM2.5 on urban heat islands with detailed in situ data and satellite images. Sustainability. 2019 Dec 10;11(24):7075.
17. Yin Y, Luo W, Jing W, Zhang J, Qin Z, Zhen M. Combined effects of Thermal-PM2.5 indicators on subjective evaluation of campus environment. Building and Environment. 2022 Aug 15;222:109381.
18. An Y, Chen C. Energy-efficient control of indoor PM2. 5 and thermal comfort in a real room using deep reinforcement learning. Energy and Buildings. 2023 Sep 15;295:113340.
19. Korsavi SS, Montazami A, Mumovic D. Perceived indoor air quality in naturally ventilated primary schools in the UK: Impact of environmental variables and thermal sensation. Indoor air. 2021 Mar;31(2):480-501.
20. Jowkar M, Rijal HB, Brusey J, Montazami A, Carlucci S, Lansdown TC. Comfort temperature and preferred adaptive behaviour in various classroom types in the UK higher learning environments. Energy and Buildings. 2020 Mar 15;211:109814.
21. Mishra AK, Ramgopal M. Thermal comfort field study in undergraduate laboratories–An analysis of occupant perceptions. Building and Environment. 2014 Jun 1;76:62-72.
22. Wang Z, Zhang X, Ning H, Ji Y. Human thermal adaptation in university classrooms and dormitories in chinese severe cold area in winter. Procedia Engineering. 2016 Jan 1;146:24-31.
23. ISO U. 28802: 2012; Ergonomics of the Physical Environment-Assessment of Environments by Means of an Environmental Survey Involving Physical Measurements of the Environment and Subjective Responses of People. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium. 2012.
24. Muller CO, Chamas H, Zouggari Y. ASHRAE Standard 62.1 and LEED: Using Enhanced Air Cleaning to Integrate IAQ and Energy Conservation.
25. ISO E. 7730. Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment–Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria ISO, Geneva. 2005.
26. Zhang G, Zheng C, Yang W, Zhang Q, Moschandreas DJ. Thermal comfort investigation of naturally ventilated classrooms in a subtropical region. Indoor and Built Environment. 2007 Apr;16(2):148-58.
27. Pereira LD, Raimondo D, Corgnati SP, da Silva MG. Assessment of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in Portuguese secondary classrooms: Methodology and results. Building and environment. 2014 Nov 1; 81:69-80.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Spring 2025 | |
| Section | Original Research | |
| Keywords | ||
| Air quality; Classroom; Thermal comfort; Indoor environment | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
