Evaluation and modeling of traffic noise in an urban area of Chhattisgarh, India
,
Abstract
Introduction: Traffic noise modeling is a rapidly growing field. Researchers are continually improving existing models and creating new ones that take into consideration complex aspects such as traffic flow patterns and the influence of geography. This study aims to test few models that may be suitable for the Indian scenario along with development of new model.
Materials and methods: In the present study, evaluation and modeling of traffic noise have been carried out. The study was carried out in 20 locations in Raipur city. Half of the locations were selected for validation of results, and half were selected for studying the best-suited model for our selected area. Six models best suited to our location were selected after performing the literature review in brief. Traffic data was collected, and models were tested.
Results: On comparing the data, it was found that out of six models, the Burgess model was found to be the most accurate, as its predicted noise levels are consistently closest to the measured noise levels across all ten locations. But the coefficient of correlation (R) for this model was found to be in the range of 0.31 to 0.64. Burgess model uses the framework of concentric zones to analyse how noise varies based on location within a city, taking into account factors such as land use, population density, and the types of activities prevalent in each zone. Further, we developed our own model by using the multiple regression method and validated our results. On performing the statistical analysis, highest value of R2 (0.83 and 0.82) were found for locations PL1 and PL8 respectively. Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) values ranged from 0.859 to 2.175, and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values ranged from 0.884 to 2.203 for all locations.
Conclusion: The high R² values, close to 1, and the low RMSE values indicate that our model fits the data well. Therefore, we can conclude that the developed model is highly suitable for predicting noise levels at our location.
2. Jamrah A, Al-Omari A, Sharabi R. Evaluation of traffic noise pollution in Amman, Jordan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2006 Sep;120:499-525.
3. Berglund B, Lindvall T, Schwela DH. New WHO guidelines for community noise. Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2000 Apr;31(4):24-9.
4. Covaciu D, Florea D, Timar J. Estimation of the noise level produced by road traffic in roundabouts. Applied Acoustics. 2015 Nov 1;98:43-51.
5. Mirshekarloo MS, Tan CY, Yu X, Zhang L, Chen S, Yao K, et al. Transparent piezoelectric film speakers for windows with active noise mitigation function. Applied Acoustics. 2018 Aug 1;137:90-7.
6. Mishra RK, Parida M, Rangnekar S. Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise along bus rapid transit system corridor. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology. 2010 Sep;7:737-50.
7. Pathak V, Tripathi BD, kumar Mishra V. Evaluation of traffic noise pollution and attitudes of exposed individuals in working place. Atmospheric Environment. 2008 May 1;42(16):3892-8.
8. Agarwal S, Swami BL. Comprehensive approach for the development of traffic noise prediction model for Jaipur city. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2011 Jan;172:113-20.
9. Dwivedi A, Kumar N, Singh P, Chourey P, Kamra R, Soni K, et al. Linear regression model for noise pollution over central Delhi to highlight the alarming threat for the environment. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 2023 Jun;9(2):1909-21.
10. Calixto A, Diniz FB, Zannin PH. The statistical modeling of road traffic noise in an urban setting. Cities. 2003 Feb 1;20(1):23-9.
11. Givargis S, Mahmoodi M. Converting the UK calculation of road traffic noise (CORTN) to a model capable of calculating LAeq, 1h for the Tehran’s roads. Applied Acoustics. 2008 Nov 1;69(11):1108-13.
12. Ahmed AA, Pradhan B. Vehicular traffic noise prediction and propagation modelling using neural networks and geospatial information system. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2019 Mar;191(3):190.
13. Burgess MA. Noise prediction for urban traffic conditions—related to measurements in the Sydney metropolitan area. Applied Acoustics. 1977 Jan 1;10(1):1-7.
14. Garg N, Mangal SK, Saini PK, Dhiman P, Maji S. Comparison of ANN and analytical models in traffic noise modeling and predictions. Acoustics Australia. 2015 Aug;43:179-89.
15. Kumar V, Ahirwar AV, Prasad AD. Monitoring and mapping noise levels of university campus in central part of India. Journal of Air Pollution and Health. 2023 Feb 26.
16. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics: Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors. International Organization for Standardization; 1993.
17. Fagotti C, Poggi A. Traffic noise abatement strategies: The analysis of real case not really effective. InProc. of 18th International Congress for Noise Abatement 1995 Jul (pp. 223-233).
18. Quartieri J, Mastorakis NE, Iannone G, Guarnaccia C, D’Ambrosio S, Troisi A, et al. A review of traffic noise predictive models. InRecent Advances in Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, 5th WSEAS International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics (MECHANICS’09) Puerto De La Cruz, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain December 2009 Dec 14 (pp. 14-16).
19. Josse. R Notions d'acoustique à l'usage des ingénieurs architectes et urbanistes. Paris: Eyrolles. 1972:213-58.
20. DoT UK. Department of Transport. Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CRTN). London: Department of Transport, Welsh Office, HMSO. 1988.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Spring 2025 | |
| Section | Original Research | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/japh.v10i2.19080 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Noise model Raipur Traffic noise | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
