Urinary levels of amorphous urate crystals as a biological marker for occupational exposure to crystalline free silica
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the obvious adverse effects of exposure to free crystalline silica and the high exposure level in silica-related occupations, the present study aimed at the investigation of renal symptoms in cement factory workers.
Materials and methods: For this reason, 128 workers who were working cement factory with a determined occupational exposure to crystalline-free silica were selected as the case group, and 143 workers who were working in the Hamedan Province Rural Water and Wastewater company without being exposed to crystalline free silica were selected as controls. Various kidney-related parameters were evaluated and compared between the selected case and control groups.
Results: The results of urine analysis between cases and control showed that there was a statistical difference between the cases and controls regarding Red Blood Cell (RBC), epithelial count, and bacteria (p<0.05). Moreover, the percentage of amorphous urate crystals of the exposed workers (cases) and control were 80.7% and 38.3%, respectively (p<0.001). The results of adjusted results showed that the odd presence of amorphous urate crystals among cases was 7.65 times of the control group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Our findings clearly showed that the level of urinary levels of amorphous urate crystals in silica-exposed individuals is higher than that of non-exposed individuals. Therefore, the presence of urinary amorphous urate crystals in exposed workers may be used as a cheap, non-invasive, and efficient method and urine biological maker for detecting silica exposure in silica-related industries.
policy. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1995;
103:152-5.
2. Park EJ, Park K. Oxidative stress and proinflammatory
responses induced by silica
nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro. Toxicology
letters. 2009; 184:18-25.
3. NIOSH. NIOSH hazard review: health effects
of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline
silica. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(ed.). 2002.
4. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation
of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Silica dust,
crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite.
InArsenic, Metals, Fibres and Dusts. International
Agency for Research on Cancer. 2012.
5. Croissant JG, Butler KS, Zink JI, Brinker CJ.
Synthetic amorphous silica nanoparticles: toxicity,
biomedical and environmental implications.
Nature Reviews Materials. 2020; 5:886-909.
6. Andraos C, Utembe W, Gulumian M.
Exceedance of environmental exposure limits to
crystalline silica in communities surrounding gold
mine tailings storage facilities in South Africa.
Science of the total environment. 2018; 619:504-
16.
7. Guha N, Straif K, Benbrahim-Tallaa L. The
IARC Monographs on the carcinogenicity of
crystalline silica. La Medicina del lavoro. 2011;
102:310-20.
8. Poormohammadi A, Moeini ES, Assari MJ,
Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Abdulahi M, et al. Risk
assessment of workers exposed to respirable
crystalline silica in silica crushing units in
Azandarian industrial zone, Hamadan, Iran.
Journal of Air Pollution and Health. 2021; 6:225-
32.
9. Hutyrova B, Smolkova P, Nakladalova M,
TichĂ˝ T, Kolek V. Case of accelerated silicosis in a
sandblaster. Industrial health. 2015;53(2):178-83.
10. Ehrlich C, Noll G, Wusterhausen E, Kalkoff
W-D, Remus R, Lehmann C. Respirable
Crystalline Silica (RCS) emissions from industrial
plants–Results from measurement programmes
in Germany. Atmospheric environment. 2013;
68:278-85.
11. Omidianidost A, Gharavandi S, Azari MR,
Hashemian AH, Ghasemkhani M, Rajati F, et
al. Occupational exposure to respirable dust,
crystalline silica and its pulmonary effects among
workers of a cement factory in Kermanshah, Iran.
Tanaffos. 2019; 18:157.
12. Mourad, Basma Hussein, and Yasmin Adel
Ashour. "Demonstration of subclinical early
nephrotoxicity induced by occupational exposure
to silica among Workers in Pottery Industry."
The International Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine 11, no. 2 (2020): 85.
13. Vupputuri S, Parks CG, Nylander-French
LA, Owen-Smith A, Hogan SL, Sandler DP.
Occupational silica exposure and chronic kidney
disease. Renal failure. 2012; 34:40-6.
14. Zhang SJ, Qian HN, Zhao Y, Sun K, Wang HQ,
Liang GQ, et al. Relationship between age and
prostate size. Asian journal of andrology. 2013;
15:116.
15. Brewster UC. Chronic kidney disease
from environmental and occupational toxins.
Connecticut medicine. 2006; 70:229-37.
16. Nuyts G, D'Haese P, Elseviers M, de Broe M,
Van Vlem E, Thys J, et al. New occupational risk
factors for chronic renal failure. The Lancet. 1995;
346:7-11.
17. Steenland K, Sanderson W, Calvert GM.
Kidney disease and arthritis in a cohort study
of workers exposed to silica. Epidemiology.
2001:405-12.
18. Steenland NK, Thun MJ, Ferguson CW, Port
FK. Occupational and other exposures associated
with male end-stage renal disease: a case/control
study. American Journal of Public Health. 1990;
80:153-7.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 7 No 4 (2022): Autumn 2022 | |
Section | Original Research | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/japh.v7i4.11382 | |
Keywords | ||
Crystalline free silica; Amorphous urate; Biological marker |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |