JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL AND TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF STEAM POWER PLANTS: A CASE STUDY OF IRAN
,
Abstract
Introduction: One of the largest proportions of human-related air pollution is produced by fossil-fuel based electricity generation units. Hence, the environmental performance that complies with technical performance receives increasing attention and seems to be the missing point in environmental impact analysis and energy policy studies. Therefore, empirical analysis which leads to increasing awareness of official policy makers concerning the technical and environmental trade-offs is the objective of the study in the electric generating sector by applying a two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
Materials and Methods: In the first stage the DEA incorporates Materials Balanced Principle (DEA-MBP) to estimate the allocation of gas, mazut and gas oil of steam plants to minimize inputs and SO2 emissions respectively with the given technology. It is then followed by applying Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) applied in the second stage investigate the other explanatory variables which may influence the efficiency and were not properly considered in the first stage analysis.
Results: The results evident that there is considerable gap between technical and environmental efficiency (76% and 10% respectively) scores. The impact of most important explanatory variables in the second stage clearly demonstrates that plant sizes and fuel type have significant influence while plant age and the year of observation have no statistically significant influence on the technical and also environmental efficiencies of steam power plants.
Conclusions: Advancement in interdisciplinary research helps to increase technical efficiency while reducing emissions by applying analytical methods, which may provide better information for decision making units. Hence, it is the management’s responsibility to improve efficiency by modifying regulation and competition performance in this respect.
IEA. Keywords: energy statistics. Paris: 2008.
information USDoE. “Country Analysis Brief: Iran”. 2013.
He B, Chen C. Energy ecological efficiency of coal fired plant in China. Energy conversion and management. 2002;43(18):2553-67.
Ilinitch AY, Soderstrom NS, E Thomas T. Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 1999;17(4):383-408.
Lanen WN. Waste minimization at 3M company: A field study in nonfinancial performance measurement. Journal of management accounting research. 1999(11):29- 43.
Kaminski J. Technologies and costs of SO2-emissions reduction for the energy sector. Applied Energy. 2003;75:165–72.
Coelli T, Lauwers L, Van Huylenbroeck G. Formation of technical, economic and environmental efficiency measures that are consistent with the materials balance condition. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity AnalysisWorking Paper. 2005;6.
Coelli T, Lauwers L, Van Huylenbroeck G. Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2007;28(1-2):3-12.
Welch E, Barnum D. Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation. Ecological Economics 2009;68:2336-43.
McDonald J. Using Least Squares and Tobit in Second Stage DEA Efficiency Analyses. European Journal of Operational Research. 2009;197:792-8.
Farrell MJ, . The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1957;120:253-81.
Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research. 1978;2(6):429-44.
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 1984;30(9):1078-92.
Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. production Frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1994.
Cook WD, Chai D, Doyle J, Green R. Hierarchies and groups in DEA. Journal of productivity analysis. 1998;10(2):177-98.
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 1997;51(3):229-40.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review. 1994:66-83.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka Jr CA. Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth. Journal of Regional Science. 2001;41(3):381-409.
Knox Lovell CA, Pastor JT, Turner JA. Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries. European journal of operational research. 1995;87(3):507-18.
Tyteca D. Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms— concepts and empirical results. Journal of productivity analysis. 1997;8(2):183-97.
Lauwers L. Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontierbased eco-efficiency models. Ecological Economics. 2009;68(6):1605-14.
Lauwers L, Van Huylenbroeck G, Rogiers G. Technical, economic and environmental efficiency analysis of pig fattening farms, Poster presentation at the 9th European Congress of Agricultural Economists, Warschau. Polen, August 24th-28th. 1999.
Seiford LM. Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). Journal of productivity analysis. 1996;7(2):99-137.
Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2008;42(3):151-7.
Rogge N. Undesirable specialization in the construction of composite policy indicators: The Environmental Performance Index. Ecological Indicators. 2012;23:143-54.
Shortall OK, Barnes AP. Greenhouse gas emissions and the technical efficiency of dairy farmers. Ecological Indicators. 2013;29(0):478-88.
Song M, Guan Y. The environmental efficiency of Wanjiang demonstration area: A Bayesian estimation approach. Ecological Indicators. 2014;36:59-67.
Thanassoulis E. Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis: a foundation text with integrated software: Springer; 2001.
Likens GE, F.H. Bormann. Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. Second Edition 2001 ed. N.Y.: Springer- Verlag; 1995. 162 p.
Reinhard S. Econometric Analysi of Economic and Environmental Efficiency of Dutch Dairy Farms. Wageningen Wageningen University; 1999.
Reinhard S, Thijssen G. Nitrogen efficiency of Dutch dairy farms: a shadow cost system approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2000;27:167-86.
Golany B, Roll Y, Rybak D. Measuring Efficiency of Power Plants in Israel by Data Envelopment Analysis. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT. 1994;41(3):291.
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research. 2008;189(1):1-18.
Welch E, Barnum D. Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation. Ecological Economics. 2009;68(8–9):2336-43.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka Jr C. Joint Production of Good and Bad Outputs with a Network Application. Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics. 2011.
Murty S, Russell RR, Levkoff SB. On modeling pollution generating technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2012;64(1):117-35.
Coelli TJ, Perelman S. A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Distance Functions: With Application to European Railways. European Journal of Operational Research. 1999;117(2):326-39.
Cooper WW, L.M. S, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: Kluwer Academic Publishers.; 2000.
Grosskopf S. Statistical Inference and Nonparametric Efficiency: A Selective Survey Journal of Productivity Analysis. 1996;7(2-3):161-76.
Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data: MIT press; 2010.
Hoff A. Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score. European Journal of Operational Research. 2007;181(1):425-35.
Papke LE, Wooldridge JM. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 1996;6(11):619-32.
Cook D, Kieschnick R, McCullogh B. Specification Errors in Studies of the Composition of Corporate Financing, University of Mississippi/University of Texas- Dallas. Drexel University, Working Paper, 2000.
Banker RD, Natarajan R. Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis,. Operations Research. 2008;56:48-58.
Banker R. Maximum Likelihood, Consistency, and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation,. Management Science. 1993;39(10):1265-73.
Barros CP. Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants: a case study for Portugal. Energy Economics. 2008;30:59-75.
Barros CP, Antunes OS. Performance assessment of Portuguese wind farms:ownership and managerial efficiency Energy Policy. 2011;39(6):3055-63.
Diewert WE, Nakamura AO. Benchmarking and the measurement of best practice efficiency: an electricity generation application. . Can J Econ. 1999;32(2):570-88.
Electricity Supply Association of Australia. 1994.
Hiebert DL. The determinants of the cost efficiency of electric generating plants: a stochastic frontier approach. South Econ J. 2002;68(4): 935-46.
Khanna M, Mundra K, Ullah A. Parametric and semiparametric
estimation of the effect of firm attributes on efficiency: the electricity generating industry in India. Trade Econ. 1999;Dev. 8 (4):419-30.
Kumar S. Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: a global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index. Ecological Economics. 2006;56(2):280-93.
Kumar S, Managi S. The Economics of Sustainable Development the Case in India. Springer. 2009.
Meibodi AE. Efficiency considerations in the electricity supply industry: the case of Iran.: University of Surrey.; 1998.
Pollitt MG. Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities: The International Evidence on Privatisation and Efficiency. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1995.
Pollitt MG. Ownership and efficiency in nuclear power production. Oxf Econ. 1996; 48(2): 342-60.
Sarica K, Or I. Efficiency assessment of Turkish power plants using data envelopment analysis. . Energy Policy. 2007;32:1484-99.
See KF, Coelli T. An analysis of factors that influence the technical efficiency of Malaysian thermal power plants. Energy Economics. 2012;34(3):677-85.
Barnum DT, Gleason JM. Bias and precision in the DEA two-stage method. Applied Economics. 2006;40(18):2305-11.
Barnum DT, Gleason JM. Measuring the efficiency of electricity generating plants with fixed proportion technology indicators. 7th International Conference on Data Envelopment Analysis; July 2009; Philadelphia2008.
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Design-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978;2(6):429-44.
White H. A heteroskedastic-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–38.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 1 No 2 (2016): Spring 2016 | |
| Section | Original Research | |
| Keywords | ||
| Environmental efficiency Data envelopment analysis Material balanced principle Electricity generation | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
