Sulfur dioxide adsorption by iron oxide nanoparticles@clinoptilolite/HCl
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on the adsorption of sulfur dioxide by modified zeolite with hydrochloric acid. In this investigation was used modified zeolite with HCl with and without iron oxide nanoparticles (Iron Oxide Nanoparticles@Clinoptilolite/HCl) as adsorbent.
Materials and methods: Structural characteristics, chemical composition and specific surface area of adsorbent were determined using the FTIR, FESEM, EDX, Mapping, XRD, XRF and BET techniques. Glass cylinder filled with zeolite seeds and SO2 cylinder balanced with N2 gas was used for experiments. It was evaluated factors affecting SO2 uptake process including temperature and contact time, also thermodynamics and kinetics of adsorption. Sulfur dioxide adsorption of real sample was taken with both adsorbents.
Results: Adsorption efficiency of SO2 in the synthetic and actual sample were %82.8±5.5 and %67.2±7.21 respectively, by modified zeolite with HCl and iron oxide nanoparticles in the optimum conditions of temperature of 25 °C and duration 28.5 min. As well as, removal percentage average was obtained in the synthetic and actual sample %46.1±4.34 and %35.8±5.85 respectively, by modified zeolite with HCl without nanoparticles in optimum condition of temperature of 25 °C and contact time of 20.5 min.The results showed that SO2 adsorption is an exothermic and spontaneous process and adsorption kinetics of sulfur dioxide by both adsorbent is more consistent Pseudo-second order kinetics model.
Conclusion: The use of iron oxide nanoparticles on the zeolite can increase SO2 removal efficiency from the gas phase.
1. Wark K, Warner CF. Air pollution: its origin and control. 1981.
2. Song X-D, Wang S, Hao C, Qiu J-S. Investigation of SO2 gas adsorption in metal–organic frameworks by molecular simulation. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2014;46(0):277-81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2014.06.003
3. Liu Z, Mao X, Tu J, Jaccard M. A comparative assessment of economic-incentive and command-and-control instruments for air pollution and CO< sub> 2 control in China's iron and steel sector. Journal of environmental management. 2014;144:135-42.
4. Girard JE, Girard J. Principles of environmental chemistry: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2013.
5. Medley AJ, Wong C-M, Thach TQ, Ma S, Lam T-H, Anderson HR. Cardiorespiratory and all-cause mortality after restrictions on sulphur content of fuel in Hong Kong: an intervention study. The lancet. 2002;360(9346):1646-52.
6. Xie S, Qi L, Zhou D. Investigation of the effects of acid rain on the deterioration of cement concrete using accelerated tests established in laboratory. Atmospheric Environment. 2004;38(27):4457-66.
7. Erdoğan Alver B. A comparative adsorption study of C< sub> 2 H< sub> 4 and SO< sub> 2 on clinoptilolite-rich tuff: Effect of acid treatment. Journal of hazardous materials. 2013;262:627-33.
8. Savage M, Cheng Y, Easun TL, Eyley JE, Argent SP, Warren MR, et al. Selective Adsorption of Sulfur Dioxide in a Robust Metal–Organic Framework Material. Advanced Materials. 2016;28(39):8705-11.
9. Srivastava RK, Jozewicz W, Singer C. SO2 scrubbing technologies: a review. Environmental Progress. 2001;20(4):219-28.
10. Gollakota SV, Chriswell CD. Study of an adsorption process using silicalite for sulfur dioxide removal from combustion gases. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 1988;27(1):139-43.
11. Allen SJ, Ivanova E, Koumanova B. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on chemically modified natural clinoptilolite. Acid modification. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2009;152(2):389-95.
12. Marcu I-C, Sđndulescu I. Study of sulfur dioxide adsorption on Y zeolite. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2004;69(7):563-9.
13. Seredych M, Bandosz TJ. Effects of surface features on adsorption of SO2 on graphite oxide/Zr (OH) 4 composites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(34):14552-60.
14. Dahlan I, Mei G, Kamaruddin AH, Mohamed AR, Lee KT. Removal of SO2 and NO over rice husk ash (RHA)/CaO-supported metal oxides. J Eng Sci Technol. 2008;3:109-16.
15. Li G, Wang Q, Jiang T, Luo J, Rao M, Peng Z. Roll-up effect of sulfur dioxide adsorption on zeolites FAU 13X and LTA 5A. Adsorption. 2017:1-12.
16. Rosas JM, Ruiz-Rosas R, Rodríguez-Mirasol J, Cordero T. Kinetic study of SO 2 removal over lignin-based activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;307:707-21.
17. Czuma N, Zarębska K, Baran P, editors. Analysis of the influence of fusion synthesis parameters on the SO2 sorption properties of zeolites produced out of fly ash. E3S Web of Conferences; 2016: EDP Sciences.
18. Bu N, Wu J, Mao R, Choe M, Zhen Q. Characterization of Activated Carbon-13X Zeolite Composite and Its Adsorption Mechanism on SO2. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016;16(8):8839-45.
19. Abdulrasheed A, Jalil A, Triwahyono S, Zaini M, Gambo Y, Ibrahim M. Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO2 and NOX: A review of existing and emerging technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;94:1067-85.
20. Wilburn MS, Epling WS. SO2 adsorption and desorption characteristics of Pd and Pt catalysts: Precious metal crystallite size dependence. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2017;534:85-93.
21. Sun W, Lin LC, Peng X, Smit B. Computational screening of porous metal‐organic frameworks and zeolites for the removal of SO2 and NOx from flue gases. AIChE Journal. 2014;60(6):2314-23.
22. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A, Moazzeni N. Sunlight photodecolorization of a mixture of Methyl Orange and Bromocresol Green by CuS incorporated in a clinoptilolite zeolite as a heterogeneous catalyst. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2013;19(5):1433-42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.01.006
23. Karousos DS, Sapalidis AA, Kouvelos EP, Romanos GE, Kanellopoulos NK. A study on natural clinoptilolite for CO2/N2 gas separation. Separation Science and Technology. 2016;51(1):83-95.
24. Garcia-Basabe Y, Rodriguez-Iznaga I, de Menorval L-C, Llewellyn P, Maurin G, Lewis DW, et al. Step-wise dealumination of natural clinoptilolite: Structural and physicochemical characterization. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2010;135(1–3):187-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.07.008
25. Henn KW, Waddill DW. Utilization of nanoscale zero‐valent iron for source remediation—A case study. Remediation Journal. 2006;16(2):57-77.
26. Ren X, Chang L, Li F, Xie K. Study of intrinsic sulfidation behavior of Fe< sub> 2 O< sub> 3 for high temperature H< sub> 2 S removal. Fuel. 2010;89(4):883-7.
27. Chaturvedi S, Dave PN, Shah N. Applications of nano-catalyst in new era. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2012;16(3):307-25.
28. Mahmoodi M, Javid N, Malakootian M. Adsorption of Sulfur Dioxide on Clinoptilolite/Nano Iron Oxide and Natural Clinoptilolite Journal of healthscope. 2018.
29. Arcibar-Orozco JA, Rangel-Mendez JR, Bandosz TJ. Reactive adsorption of SO< sub> 2 on activated carbons with deposited iron nanoparticles. Journal of hazardous materials. 2013;246:300-9.
30. Hernandez M, Corona L, Gonzalez A, Rojas F, Lara V, Silva F. Quantitative study of the adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, and p-Xylene) on dealuminated clinoptilolites. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2005;44(9):2908-16.
31. Hong S-S, Lee G-H, Lee G-D. Catalytic combustion of benzene over supported metal oxides catalysts. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2003;20(3):440-4.
32. Li P, Miser DE, Rabiei S, Yadav RT, Hajaligol MR. The removal of carbon monoxide by iron oxide nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2003;43(2):151-62.
33. Tahir K, Ahmad A, Li B, Nazir S, Khan AU, Nasir T, et al. Visible light photo catalytic inactivation of bacteria and photo degradation of methylene blue with Ag/TiO 2 nanocomposite prepared by a novel method. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2016;162:189-98.
34. Garshasbi V, Jahangiri M, Anbia M. Equilibrium CO 2 adsorption on zeolite 13X prepared from natural clays. Applied Surface Science. 2017;393:225-33.
35. Liu X-L, Guo J-X, Chu Y-H, Luo D-M, Yin H-Q, Sun M-C, et al. Desulfurization performance of iron supported on activated carbon. Fuel. 2014;123:93-100.
36. Association APH, Association AWW, Federation WPC, Federation WE. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: American Public Health Association.; 1915.
37. Ho Y-S. Absorption of heavy metals from waste streams by peat: University of Birmingham; 1995.
38. Grefing LL, Horrn JL, Lange JG, Lindh JP, Norstedt PA, Salvius L, et al. Kungl. Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar. Stockholm :: L.L. Grefing; 1898.
39. Zhao C, Guo Y, Li W, Bu C, Wang X, Lu P. Experimental and modeling investigation on CO 2 sorption kinetics over K 2 CO 3-modified silica aerogels. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;312:50-8.
40. Nandi B, Goswami A, Purkait M. Removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions by kaolin: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Applied Clay Science. 2009;42(3):583-90.
41. Chattaraj S, Mohanty D, Kumar T, Halder G. Thermodynamics, kinetics and modeling of sorption behaviour of coalbed methane–A review. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources. 2016;16:14-33.
42. Majeed NS, Majeed JT. Synthesis of Nanozeolite NaA from Pure Source Material Using Sol Gel Method. Journal of Engineering. 2017;23(6):52-62.
43. Ruíz-Baltazar A, Esparza R, Gonzalez M, Rosas G, Pérez R. Preparation and characterization of natural zeolite modified with iron nanoparticles. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2015;16(1):274.
44. Zhou X, Yi H, Tang X, Deng H, Liu H. Thermodynamics for the adsorption of SO 2, NO and CO 2 from flue gas on activated carbon fiber. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;200:399-404.
45. Zhang T, Li J, Yu S, Wang Y. Preparation and Characterization of a New Desulfurizer and Its Performance on Removal of SO2. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2014;2(02):68.
46. Bahiraei A, Afkhami A, Madrakian T, Gheitaran R. Preparation and characterization of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and investigation of its adsorption performance for sulfide, sulfite and thiosulfate from aqueous solutions using ultrasonic assisted method: Modeling and optimization. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2018;40:1049-58.
47. Deng H, Yi H, Tang X, Yu Q, Ning P, Yang L. Adsorption equilibrium for sulfur dioxide, nitric oxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen on 13X and 5A zeolites. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;188:77-85.
48. Dursun AY. A comparative study on determination of the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of biosorption of copper (II) and lead (II) ions onto pretreated Aspergillus niger. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2006;28(2):187-95.
49. Pimentel P, Melo M, Melo D, Assunçao A, Henrique D, Silva C, et al. Kinetics and thermodynamics of Cu (II) adsorption on oil shale wastes. Fuel Processing Technology. 2008;89(1):62-7.
50. Wang S-P, Zhang T-Y, Su Y, Wang S-R, Zhang S-M, Zhu B-L, et al. An investigation of catalytic activity for CO oxidation of CuO/CexZr1–xO2 catalysts. Catalysis Letters. 2008;121(1-2):70-6.
51. Zhang W-x. Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: an overview. Journal of nanoparticle Research. 2003;5(3):323-32.
52. Zou L, Luo Y, Hooper M, Hu E. Removal of VOCs by photocatalysis process using adsorption enhanced TiO 2–SiO 2 catalyst. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2006;45(11):959-64.
2. Song X-D, Wang S, Hao C, Qiu J-S. Investigation of SO2 gas adsorption in metal–organic frameworks by molecular simulation. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2014;46(0):277-81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2014.06.003
3. Liu Z, Mao X, Tu J, Jaccard M. A comparative assessment of economic-incentive and command-and-control instruments for air pollution and CO< sub> 2 control in China's iron and steel sector. Journal of environmental management. 2014;144:135-42.
4. Girard JE, Girard J. Principles of environmental chemistry: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2013.
5. Medley AJ, Wong C-M, Thach TQ, Ma S, Lam T-H, Anderson HR. Cardiorespiratory and all-cause mortality after restrictions on sulphur content of fuel in Hong Kong: an intervention study. The lancet. 2002;360(9346):1646-52.
6. Xie S, Qi L, Zhou D. Investigation of the effects of acid rain on the deterioration of cement concrete using accelerated tests established in laboratory. Atmospheric Environment. 2004;38(27):4457-66.
7. Erdoğan Alver B. A comparative adsorption study of C< sub> 2 H< sub> 4 and SO< sub> 2 on clinoptilolite-rich tuff: Effect of acid treatment. Journal of hazardous materials. 2013;262:627-33.
8. Savage M, Cheng Y, Easun TL, Eyley JE, Argent SP, Warren MR, et al. Selective Adsorption of Sulfur Dioxide in a Robust Metal–Organic Framework Material. Advanced Materials. 2016;28(39):8705-11.
9. Srivastava RK, Jozewicz W, Singer C. SO2 scrubbing technologies: a review. Environmental Progress. 2001;20(4):219-28.
10. Gollakota SV, Chriswell CD. Study of an adsorption process using silicalite for sulfur dioxide removal from combustion gases. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 1988;27(1):139-43.
11. Allen SJ, Ivanova E, Koumanova B. Adsorption of sulfur dioxide on chemically modified natural clinoptilolite. Acid modification. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2009;152(2):389-95.
12. Marcu I-C, Sđndulescu I. Study of sulfur dioxide adsorption on Y zeolite. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2004;69(7):563-9.
13. Seredych M, Bandosz TJ. Effects of surface features on adsorption of SO2 on graphite oxide/Zr (OH) 4 composites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(34):14552-60.
14. Dahlan I, Mei G, Kamaruddin AH, Mohamed AR, Lee KT. Removal of SO2 and NO over rice husk ash (RHA)/CaO-supported metal oxides. J Eng Sci Technol. 2008;3:109-16.
15. Li G, Wang Q, Jiang T, Luo J, Rao M, Peng Z. Roll-up effect of sulfur dioxide adsorption on zeolites FAU 13X and LTA 5A. Adsorption. 2017:1-12.
16. Rosas JM, Ruiz-Rosas R, Rodríguez-Mirasol J, Cordero T. Kinetic study of SO 2 removal over lignin-based activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;307:707-21.
17. Czuma N, Zarębska K, Baran P, editors. Analysis of the influence of fusion synthesis parameters on the SO2 sorption properties of zeolites produced out of fly ash. E3S Web of Conferences; 2016: EDP Sciences.
18. Bu N, Wu J, Mao R, Choe M, Zhen Q. Characterization of Activated Carbon-13X Zeolite Composite and Its Adsorption Mechanism on SO2. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016;16(8):8839-45.
19. Abdulrasheed A, Jalil A, Triwahyono S, Zaini M, Gambo Y, Ibrahim M. Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO2 and NOX: A review of existing and emerging technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;94:1067-85.
20. Wilburn MS, Epling WS. SO2 adsorption and desorption characteristics of Pd and Pt catalysts: Precious metal crystallite size dependence. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2017;534:85-93.
21. Sun W, Lin LC, Peng X, Smit B. Computational screening of porous metal‐organic frameworks and zeolites for the removal of SO2 and NOx from flue gases. AIChE Journal. 2014;60(6):2314-23.
22. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A, Moazzeni N. Sunlight photodecolorization of a mixture of Methyl Orange and Bromocresol Green by CuS incorporated in a clinoptilolite zeolite as a heterogeneous catalyst. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2013;19(5):1433-42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.01.006
23. Karousos DS, Sapalidis AA, Kouvelos EP, Romanos GE, Kanellopoulos NK. A study on natural clinoptilolite for CO2/N2 gas separation. Separation Science and Technology. 2016;51(1):83-95.
24. Garcia-Basabe Y, Rodriguez-Iznaga I, de Menorval L-C, Llewellyn P, Maurin G, Lewis DW, et al. Step-wise dealumination of natural clinoptilolite: Structural and physicochemical characterization. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2010;135(1–3):187-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.07.008
25. Henn KW, Waddill DW. Utilization of nanoscale zero‐valent iron for source remediation—A case study. Remediation Journal. 2006;16(2):57-77.
26. Ren X, Chang L, Li F, Xie K. Study of intrinsic sulfidation behavior of Fe< sub> 2 O< sub> 3 for high temperature H< sub> 2 S removal. Fuel. 2010;89(4):883-7.
27. Chaturvedi S, Dave PN, Shah N. Applications of nano-catalyst in new era. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2012;16(3):307-25.
28. Mahmoodi M, Javid N, Malakootian M. Adsorption of Sulfur Dioxide on Clinoptilolite/Nano Iron Oxide and Natural Clinoptilolite Journal of healthscope. 2018.
29. Arcibar-Orozco JA, Rangel-Mendez JR, Bandosz TJ. Reactive adsorption of SO< sub> 2 on activated carbons with deposited iron nanoparticles. Journal of hazardous materials. 2013;246:300-9.
30. Hernandez M, Corona L, Gonzalez A, Rojas F, Lara V, Silva F. Quantitative study of the adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, and p-Xylene) on dealuminated clinoptilolites. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2005;44(9):2908-16.
31. Hong S-S, Lee G-H, Lee G-D. Catalytic combustion of benzene over supported metal oxides catalysts. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2003;20(3):440-4.
32. Li P, Miser DE, Rabiei S, Yadav RT, Hajaligol MR. The removal of carbon monoxide by iron oxide nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2003;43(2):151-62.
33. Tahir K, Ahmad A, Li B, Nazir S, Khan AU, Nasir T, et al. Visible light photo catalytic inactivation of bacteria and photo degradation of methylene blue with Ag/TiO 2 nanocomposite prepared by a novel method. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2016;162:189-98.
34. Garshasbi V, Jahangiri M, Anbia M. Equilibrium CO 2 adsorption on zeolite 13X prepared from natural clays. Applied Surface Science. 2017;393:225-33.
35. Liu X-L, Guo J-X, Chu Y-H, Luo D-M, Yin H-Q, Sun M-C, et al. Desulfurization performance of iron supported on activated carbon. Fuel. 2014;123:93-100.
36. Association APH, Association AWW, Federation WPC, Federation WE. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: American Public Health Association.; 1915.
37. Ho Y-S. Absorption of heavy metals from waste streams by peat: University of Birmingham; 1995.
38. Grefing LL, Horrn JL, Lange JG, Lindh JP, Norstedt PA, Salvius L, et al. Kungl. Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar. Stockholm :: L.L. Grefing; 1898.
39. Zhao C, Guo Y, Li W, Bu C, Wang X, Lu P. Experimental and modeling investigation on CO 2 sorption kinetics over K 2 CO 3-modified silica aerogels. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;312:50-8.
40. Nandi B, Goswami A, Purkait M. Removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions by kaolin: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Applied Clay Science. 2009;42(3):583-90.
41. Chattaraj S, Mohanty D, Kumar T, Halder G. Thermodynamics, kinetics and modeling of sorption behaviour of coalbed methane–A review. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources. 2016;16:14-33.
42. Majeed NS, Majeed JT. Synthesis of Nanozeolite NaA from Pure Source Material Using Sol Gel Method. Journal of Engineering. 2017;23(6):52-62.
43. Ruíz-Baltazar A, Esparza R, Gonzalez M, Rosas G, Pérez R. Preparation and characterization of natural zeolite modified with iron nanoparticles. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2015;16(1):274.
44. Zhou X, Yi H, Tang X, Deng H, Liu H. Thermodynamics for the adsorption of SO 2, NO and CO 2 from flue gas on activated carbon fiber. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;200:399-404.
45. Zhang T, Li J, Yu S, Wang Y. Preparation and Characterization of a New Desulfurizer and Its Performance on Removal of SO2. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2014;2(02):68.
46. Bahiraei A, Afkhami A, Madrakian T, Gheitaran R. Preparation and characterization of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and investigation of its adsorption performance for sulfide, sulfite and thiosulfate from aqueous solutions using ultrasonic assisted method: Modeling and optimization. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2018;40:1049-58.
47. Deng H, Yi H, Tang X, Yu Q, Ning P, Yang L. Adsorption equilibrium for sulfur dioxide, nitric oxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen on 13X and 5A zeolites. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;188:77-85.
48. Dursun AY. A comparative study on determination of the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of biosorption of copper (II) and lead (II) ions onto pretreated Aspergillus niger. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2006;28(2):187-95.
49. Pimentel P, Melo M, Melo D, Assunçao A, Henrique D, Silva C, et al. Kinetics and thermodynamics of Cu (II) adsorption on oil shale wastes. Fuel Processing Technology. 2008;89(1):62-7.
50. Wang S-P, Zhang T-Y, Su Y, Wang S-R, Zhang S-M, Zhu B-L, et al. An investigation of catalytic activity for CO oxidation of CuO/CexZr1–xO2 catalysts. Catalysis Letters. 2008;121(1-2):70-6.
51. Zhang W-x. Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: an overview. Journal of nanoparticle Research. 2003;5(3):323-32.
52. Zou L, Luo Y, Hooper M, Hu E. Removal of VOCs by photocatalysis process using adsorption enhanced TiO 2–SiO 2 catalyst. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2006;45(11):959-64.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 5 No 2 (2020): Spring 2020 | |
| Section | Original Research | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/japh.v5i2.4239 | |
| Keywords | ||
| adsorption, iron oxide, nanoparticles, sulfur dioxide, zeolite | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Mahmoodi Meimand M, Jonidi Jafari A, Nasiri A, Malakootian M. Sulfur dioxide adsorption by iron oxide nanoparticles@clinoptilolite/HCl. JAPH. 2020;5(2):107-120.
